You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
More on the role of the Iranian al-Qaeda
2004-02-16
Al-Qaida has been restructured and has a "board of managers" in Iran, a prominent Spanish judge told a newspaper on Sunday. Baltasar Garzon, who investigates "terrorism linked to Islamic fundamenatlism", told El Periodico that although Iran’s al-Qaida cell does not necessarily issue orders, its does coordinate operations. He said: "Currently there is coordination, a series of objectives clearly established (by al-Qaida), but there is no need for an order for an act to be executed... It’s diffused terrorism." Garzon issued an international arrest warrant last September for Usama bin Ladin in the framework of an inquiry into a Spanish al-Qaida cell.
That would be Abu Dahdah’s. Dahdah was one of the highest-ranking al-Qaeda operatives in continental Europe when 9/11 occurred (and it may be just a coincidence that his deputy, Yousef Galan, went to dinner parties at the Iraqi embassy in Madrid) and was the direct link by Mohammed Atta’s Hamburg cell and the top military commander Mohammed Atef in Afghanistan. The Spanished loads of documents when they shut Dahdah’s operation down, and it’d be interesting to see what they found.
President Muhammad Khatami said piously that "those who have committed crimes in Iran will be judged in Iran and the others will be extradited to their country of origin... "There is no place for al-Qaida, no place for any terrorist, for those who act against peace in the world." Khatami added al-Qaida was "very hostile" to the Iranian government.
Posted by:Dan Darling

#3  Or, if Osama's worm food. Then they'd be free to pursue their own agendas.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2004-2-16 8:47:09 AM  

#2   Unclear, which is why I'm looking around to get a full transcript of what all Garzon said. Though Saif al-Adel and Junior (Saad) both have extremely strong ties to bin Laden, so I'd be surprised if they've decided to implement their own agenda unless there's been some kind of a coup.
Posted by: Dan Darling   2004-2-16 1:41:26 AM  

#1  In yesterdays article on the Board of Directors, Garzon said "This council has, on some issues, maintained positions critical of Osama bin Laden". Does that make the rumor of Bin Ladin being in Iran less likely, or does it mean that his lieutenants are now following their own agenda?
Posted by: Paul Moloney   2004-2-16 1:35:47 AM  

00:00