You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
U.S. Rebuffs Cleric on Iraqi Vote Plan
2004-01-13
L. Paul Bremer, the U.S. civilian administrator of Iraq, on Monday rebuffed a demand from the country's most influential Shiite Muslim cleric for early elections that many analysts say would put power into the hands of the country's large and impoverished Shiite majority. Bremer said that a plan devised last November for a transitional assembly created through a system of regional caucuses would proceed despite the opposition of Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani. The caucus system is "the best way forward before the return of sovereignty to the Iraqi people and to provide for elections in about a year now to a constituent assembly," Bremer told Radio Free Europe. Sistani's opposition poses a serious challenge to American plans to cede authority in Iraq this summer to a transitional government. So far, the largely Shiite south has been relatively friendly to American-led occupation forces. But some violence has flared in recent days, giving a taste of the danger should Shiites resist en masse. In his statement Sunday, Sistani alluded to the possibility of violence among fellow Shiites unless direct elections were held. He has yet to put his objections into the form of a fatwa, a religious edict that many Shiites would consider law.
I still think that something will be worked out. Sistani's too important to ignore.
Posted by:Fred Pruitt

#3  Since Iraq has a built-in Shiite majority (60%), constitution amendments (if they ever get around to writing one) should probably require 75% majorities. The national legislature should resemble the US, with one chamber based on population and other with a fixed number of seats per province. Electoral districts for national elections within a given province should be determined by elected provincial legislatures once a decade, as in the US.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2004-1-13 9:58:17 AM  

#2  Good! You have to remember that Iraqis have a fairly vague notion of what democracy is all about. The one-person-one-vote bit mr. Sistani probably gets. The notion of checks and balances is probably harder for him to grasp.

In a multi-ethnic state there has to be protections for minorities.
Posted by: phil_b   2004-1-13 2:52:42 AM  

#1  Sistani can threaten what he likes. We've already Iraqified this debate -- via the Governing Council members, who are (with a few exceptions) as screwed as anyone if Sistani turns out to have veto power over the governance of their country (not to mention balance-of-power issues etc.).
Posted by: someone   2004-1-13 2:03:52 AM  

00:00