You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Middle East
600 Lawyers Volunteer to Defend Saddam
2003-12-24
Professional courtesy, of course.
AMMAN, Jordan (AP) - More than 600 Jordanian lawyers have volunteered to defend former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, the president of the Jordanian Bar Association said Tuesday.
Ramsey Clark, take a number!
The Arab Lawyer’s Union, which comprises members from across the Arab world, is setting up an international team for Saddam’s defense, Hussein Mejali told The Associated Press. "I expect more volunteers and thousands of Arab and international lawyers to register their names to be part of the defense team," he said. "We are all willing to spare no efforts to help the Iraqi president."
Wait til they find out that Saddam can’t afford more than about 100 lawyers.
Officials at the Arab Lawyer’s Union, based in Cairo, Egypt, could not be reached for comment.
The vaunted Arab Lawyer’s Union, official motto, "Yes, effendi"!
Mejali said last week he believed Saddam was unlawfully deposed by coalition forces and unlawfully captured by U.S. troops. He maintains Saddam is Iraq’s legitimate president because the U.S.-led occupation has no legality.
But he’s a lawyer, he’s supposed to say that.
On Monday, Jordanian lawyer Saleh Armouti said he and French attorney Emmanuel Ludot are trying to obtain American permission to visit Saddam to ask to defend him.
I’m sure they can just sash-shay up to Mr. Bremer and ask.
Jordanian obsequious professional organizations, including the bar association, have long supported Saddam, including during Iraq’s 1990 invasion of Kuwait.

Iraqi Governing Council members have said Saddam will be tried in a special war crimes tribunal established with provisions taken from the International Criminal Court. The tribunal was signed into law on Dec. 10, just three days before U.S. troops captured Saddam near his hometown of Tikrit
That’s what an experienced trial lawyers calls "a coincidence."
No decision has been made on how or when Saddam will be tried or what charges he will face.
"Our lawyers will get back to your lawyers."
Posted by:Steve White

#14  Here's one for you, cingold.
Why do lawyers wear ties?
It keeps the foreskin from going up over their heads.
Posted by: tu3031   2003-12-24 4:00:09 PM  

#13  CrazyFool -- actually not, but it is a pretty close match, isn't it? Including promises of largess at the expense of others.

By the way, got any lawyer jokes? -- I love 'em! E.g., two lawyers met at a cocktail party. “How’s business?” asked the first. “Rotten,” replied the other. “Yesterday, I chased an ambulance for twenty miles. When I finally caught up to it, there was already another lawyer hanging on to the bumper.”

Or, how about this one . . . A junior partner in a law firm was sent to a far away country to represent a long-term client accused of robbery. After days of trial, the case was won, the client acquitted and released. Excited about his success, the attorney e-mailed the firm: “Justice prevailed.”

The senior partner replied in haste, “Appeal immediately.”
Posted by: cingold   2003-12-24 3:48:39 PM  

#12  There is/was CTLA, the California Trial Lawyers Association. Some got oopsy about an ambo-chasing image and formed a new group CAOC, Consumer Attorneys of California. There are rumors the acronym was originally to be CACA, until it was noticed California had a significant Hispanic population.

Lawyers wonder why non-lawyers lawyer-bash. It's cathartic.
Posted by: Glenn (not Reynolds)   2003-12-24 2:41:25 PM  

#11  cingold, Did you cut-and-paste that from the last democratic national convention?
Posted by: CrazyFool   2003-12-24 12:01:08 PM  

#10  4thInfVet: The familiar quote, “THE FIRST THING WE DO, LET'S KILL ALL THE LAWYERS!” actually supports the profession of lawyers as a safeguard to stable society. The phrase comes from William Shakespeare’s Second Part of King Henry the Sixth, Act IV. Scene II., where plots of bloody rebellion are being hatched, and reads more fully as:

Cade.  Be brave, then; for your captain is brave, and vows reformation. There shall be in England seven halfpenny loaves sold for a penny; the three-hooped pot shall have ten hoops; and I will make it felony to drink small beer. All the realm shall be in common, and in Cheapside shall my palfrey go to grass. And when I am king,—as king I will be,—
All.  God save your majesty!
Cade.  I thank you, good people: there shall be no money; all shall eat and drink on my score; and I will apparel them all in one livery, that they may agree like brothers, and worship me their lord.
Dick.  The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.
Cade.  Nay, that I mean to do. Is not this a lamentable thing, that of the skin of an innocent lamb should be made parchment? that parchment, being scribbled o’er, should undo a man? Some say the bee stings; but I say, ’tis the bee’s wax, for I did but seal once to a thing, and I was never mine own man since. How now! who’s there?

Now, doesn’t this sound like familiar political propaganda (a chicken in every pot)? My old trial professor [a staunch evangelical Christian, and incredibly conservative] explained to the class the most basic reason for the American tradition of “innocent until proven guilty” and need for “proof beyond a reasonable doubt” before a jury of peers (when even the village idiot knows a person to be guilty). He said something to the effect that “We make sure the systems works, even for the worst of us, and make the government prove its case; so that if the best of us is ever accused, we have some reasonable chance of acquittal.”

Now granted, I’m a trial lawyer [and a Plaintiff’s trial lawyer at that] defending my profession, but I truly do believe that the third branch of our government, the Courts (and which make lawyers officers of the court and polices the profession) is essential to our way of life. I say give Saddam every conceivable opportunity to make the Iraqi government prove his guilt, let the jury decide, and then let them execute the sentence and send him on to meet his Maker.

By the way, you can have some confidence in what I’m writing, because I’m not speaking -- I’m writing. [Q: How do you know when a lawyer is lying? A: His lips are moving.]
Posted by: cingold   2003-12-24 11:15:57 AM  

#9  Let's take a flight of fantasy and suppose that a Jordanian lawyer gets Saddam off on a technicality. What are the odds that Saddam and the lawyer would survive the Iranian, Kurd, Shiite, and Israeli hitmen sent their way?

Question: What do you call 100 Jordanian lawyers at the bottom of the Persian Gulf?

Answer: A good start.
Posted by: Tom   2003-12-24 9:49:13 AM  

#8  600 Jordanian lawyers and a French guy?
Lotsa luck, Sammy!
Posted by: tu3031   2003-12-24 9:45:45 AM  

#7  I was going to say mention once seeing a book titled Lawyers and Other Reptiles, but I won't.
Posted by: Glenn (not Reynolds)   2003-12-24 9:21:23 AM  

#6  Moslem version of OJ's Dream Team

They would have to be virgins though, I suppose. And why 600? 666 would be more appropriate. Maybe they're not counting the support staff.
Posted by: Rafael   2003-12-24 8:19:25 AM  

#5  600,sounds like the Moslem version of OJ's Dream Team.
Posted by: raptor   2003-12-24 8:11:26 AM  

#4  Well, it's going to get (legally) messy over there. They haven't even discussed avenues of appeal from the Iraqi tribunals.

I'd better re-iterate my advice from the day he was captured: First, try him in a US Military tribunal, get him convicted and sentenced (to death). Next, let the Iraqis have him, but maintain physical custody of Saddam, so no tricks can be pulled. They will likely convict him and sentence him to die. Then, probably about the time of the US election, allow the most competent international tribunal to try him, STILL MAINTAINING PHYSICAL CUSTODY. We can offer up a ship under our control to perform the trial on, or it can be done by satellite link, but WE DON'T TURN HIM OVER TO THEM, WE WON'T GET HIM BACK FOR EXECUTION OF OUR SENTENCE IF WE DO.
Posted by: Rivrdog   2003-12-24 7:20:14 AM  

#3  So these lawyers believe that the Saddamite attacks on Kuwait, Iran and internal ethnic groups were legal? I wonder how these frauds feel about suicide bombers. The United Arab Emirates bases their civil justice system on British civil codes. Jordanians might try that. Didn't Churchill say, "I created Jordan with a stroke of a pen on a Wednesday morning"?
Posted by: Vlad the Muslim Impaler   2003-12-24 2:22:41 AM  

#2  If Saddam is smart, he'll hire some Jewish lawyers real fast. Although that might end up getting him killed by his fan-base...
Posted by: Charles   2003-12-24 2:19:49 AM  

#1  THE FIRST THING WE DO, LET'S KILL ALL THE LAWYERS!
Posted by: 4thInfVet   2003-12-24 2:15:59 AM  

00:00