You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Down Under
BBC: Anger at Australian nuclear cargo
2003-10-28
EFL from Worldwire
Australia has dispatched its first shipment of used nuclear fuel to Europe in two years despite furious protests.
No to globalism, keep our nuclear waste at home! And free that Mumia guy, we like his videos.
Five lorries crossed suburban Sydney in the dead of night to deliver 344 spent nuclear fuel rods to a French container ship, the Fret Moselle. Once loaded, the ship then quickly left port before dawn, bound for France where the rods will be reprocessed.
Isn’t the reprocessing center in NK closer?
Activists from the environmental group Greenpeace warily circled the ship in dinghies to condemn the shipment, saying it was fraught with danger.
"There is great danger!"
The shipment is fraught with danger because we are distracting the pilot. Watch how close we get. Look out Bob... that was close. Maybe this could be an X-game.
"These casks are vulnerable to attack by morons in xodiacs terrorist attack," said spokesman James Courtney. "I think that the federal government is downplaying the risk of terrorism when it suits them and playing it up when they want to use it to their advantage."
Whereas Greenpeace is continuously believes that security should be lighter for all installations that we are trying to attack.
Since the 11 September attacks on the US, all countries have stepped up security around the transport of radioactive materials. But activists condemned what they said was a huge security operation at the dock as a waste of taxpayers’ money.
Didn’t they just say that there wasn’t enough security? and that the shipment was in danger.
"Yes! Danger! Great danger!... Oh, hold me, Ethel!"
"There were 10 police launches protecting the vessel, including fast inflatable vessels with guys in black helmets and night-vision goggles... racing around the water," said one, Danny Kennedy.
Psst Danny, that was you guys.
"It is an obscene abuse of the public purse only necessary because of morons like us."
"That's money that could be better spent on subsidizing public interest groups, like... ummm... us."
Cogema is contracted to extract and retain enriched uranium and send intermediate-level radioactive waste back to Australia for long-term storage. However, Greenpeace alleges that because of summer, fall, winter and spring holidays technical problems in France, no Australian nuclear fuel has yet been reprocessed.
No luck here, boys. It’s on to Iran.
Posted by:Super Hose

#4  Slightly off topic.

A Piece of the Green vessel was denied docking at the port of Miami. No link.... No name of vessel... but I believe it's an ex Soviet icebreaker. I assume the fitters are having much fun..
Posted by: Shipman   2003-10-28 7:28:02 PM  

#3  If you read down to the bottom of the article, you see that this is fuel from Australia's sole nuclear reactor, which is a research facility.

In December 2001, Greenpeace breached "security" at Lucas Heights, wandered around the place, and hung a giant banner saying "Nuclear: Never Safe".

I was thinking that if this had happened in the US, there'd be bullet-riddled corpses, and the lack of same might explain why nuclear was not safe in Australia.

(Of course, this is a research reactor. When I was an undergrad, back in the early '80s, we had a nuclear reactor on campus. If I recall correctly, they kept track of who was in the building because of exposure concerns, but I don't remember anyone being especially paranoid about sabotage. Ah, innocent days!)
Posted by: Angie Schultz   2003-10-28 4:48:35 PM  

#2  Activists from the environmental group Greenpeace circled the ship in dinghies to condemn the shipment, saying it was fraught with danger.

"These casks are vulnerable to attack by morons in xodiacs terrorist attack," said spokesman James Courtney. "I think that the federal government is downplaying the risk of terrorism when it suits them and playing it up when they want to use it to their advantage."


Well would it be as big a security risk if these Greenpeace IDIOTS weren't going so far as to making it obvious which ship is carrying the damn nuclear cargo?????

Asswipes.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2003-10-28 3:47:12 PM  

#1  Shades of the garbage scow that traveled for years looking for a place to take its crap.
I'm sure Kimmie would love to have the spent fuel - if the Aussies threw in a few bags of dog food rice.
Posted by: Spot   2003-10-28 3:08:58 PM  

00:00