You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Fifth Column
The picture which shames US army
2003-10-24
Hat tip: WSJ Best of the Web.
Is this the best they’ve got? Go to the link to see these shocking pictures.

Whoever's got my keys, you've got one chance. 'Fess up now!By Yvonne Ridley
Does that name sound familiar?
A secretly taken picture of an American soldier frisking an Afghan child has shocked human rights campaigners across the world.
It’s just... I can’t find the words... terrifying.
The picture was given to Al-jazeera.net by the Islamic Observation Centre to highlight the plight of children in Afghanistan.It will now be shown to delegates and discussed at the Washington Conference on Civil Liberties in America on Saturday, 25 October.
It’s not in America, it’s in Afghanistan. Oh, hell. Set up the war crimes trials anyways.
Taken by a strategically placed camera, and using a telephoto lens, the undercover photographer snapped a four-year-old child having his clothing searched by a heavily armed US soldier.
Get his name! I want him court martialed!
The child and his friends were playing in the village of Zermit in Paktika when American soldiers, hunting for Taliban fighters, arrived. "Those children could have been carrying explosives," said an unapologetic US Major Peter Mitchell who was shown the picture by Aljazeera.net.
At least the major had the good grace not to burst out laughing in their faces.
Major Mitchell, a US marine and spokesman for US Central Command, added: "The troops on the ground in Afghanistan will respond accordingly to whatever threat in that environment exists. Maybe they received intelligence that children were carrying explosives and that the children could be used against coalition forces. Coalition forces will do whatever it is they need to do to protect themselves. In times of conflict their personal security comes before hearts and minds."
Amen.
Trigger fingers ???????
"If someone is offended because a four-year-old is being searched they should know that the security of forces will always come first."
Amen again.
Aljazeera.net was given another picture also taken in Zermit village, at the same time, which appeared to show nervous-looking, armed US soldiers aiming their weapons at a sheep during a house search.
Must’ve been pissed that the troopies were checking out their girlfriends.
Not everyone shares Major Mitchell’s views of the child search. Mauri Saalakhan, director of the Peace and Justice Foundation in America said he was shocked when shown the pictures by Aljazeera.net. "My first reaction is concern for the welfare of the children of Afghanistan. It is quite possible tragedies could unfold if trigger-nervous US soldiers look at these children as potential security risks."
Take a pill, Mauri. A big one. Slow day in fifth column land?
"We will raise awareness about this and will certainly be discussing the issue at the civil liberties conference later this month in Washington," added Saalakhan.
Yes, do that. Look like a total fool to anyone but your fellow travelers.
Yasser al-Sirri, director of the Islamic Observation Centre based in London, said one of his correspondents based in Afghanistan and Pakistan had taken the picture, but wished to remain anonymous so he could continue his work. "This is a shocking picture. We want Aljazeera.net to show the world what the Americans are doing in Afghanistan. It is a picture which will shame the US military," added Ansiri, spokesman for the centre which is a human rights organisation.
Grasping at straws are we?

If you're new to this site and confused, click on the hyperlinks for more detail.

Yvonne is a nutcake British reporterette who was once arrested by the Taliban for sneaking into the country in the wake of 9-11-01. She blamed the CIA for that. She later converted to Islam. Her politix would be hard left if they had any coherence.

Islamic Observation Centre is an Islamist fifth column headquartered in London. Karim Touzani and Kacem Bakkali, who assassinated Ahmed Shah Masood two days before 9-11-01 were carrying letters of introduction from IOC. They were signed by Yasser al-Sirri, the organization's director. When al-Qaeda bigs depart this vale of tears, their obituaries are often issued by OIC.

Yasser al-Sirri (I corrected the spelling in the article), described as "the mouthpiece of al Qaeda in Britain," was convicted in Egypt and sentenced to death for a bomb attack that killed a 12-year-old girl, which is why he now lives in Britain. He was arrested in October, 2001, but I guess he was released for the usual lack of evidence reasons, the witnesses being dead and all.

The Peace and Justice Foundation is one of the Islamic front groups in the U.S. Lately it's been the mouthpiece for Craig and Cindy Corrie, the parents of Rachel (Saint Pancake) Corrie.
Posted by:tu3031

#21  Mr.Ansiri: "Drats Abu! Our high tech weapon delivery system plans have somehow fallen into enemy hands. Foiled again!!!

Female suicide bombers (Isreal and Chechnya), Pics of Paleo kids dressed up in suicide garb,
History of Vietnamese kids employed in the same fashion (shoebox bombs, grenades strapped under their armpits and told to go touch the US planes, etc)

Some people just don't get it!

God bless the Marines!


Posted by: Paul   2003-10-24 6:24:02 PM  

#20  The picture is hilarious, If you had been there, you would have seen the gum or the Lifesavers come out next - without a doubt.

We lost a helo trying to medivac a sick kid from the Afghan mountains in the middle of winter.

It's not just the GI's with the gum and Lifesavers bit, I'm sure soldiers from every Western country do the same thing. One reason that soldiers like kids is that some of these GI's probably have kids that old or younger at home and miss them.

Heard a story once about some Air Force guys after WWII that arranged to air drop toys and candy to kids throughout West Germany. Without authorization they began to fly over East Germany and drop as well.
Some officer pitched a fit, but the load master told him something to the effect of, "sir, the damn commie kids like toys and candy too." The crew continued to make drops into East Germany.
Posted by: Super Hose   2003-10-24 5:59:35 PM  

#19  Here's Yvonne's bio from the BBC when the Taliban had her back in 2001:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1570394.stm

Some interesting tidbits in there. Especially, her kid's daddy.
Posted by: tu3031   2003-10-24 4:17:56 PM  

#18  Just wanted to drop a note. Post or not as you see fit...

An incident yesterday prompted me to think (as well as to boil with anger)...

I live in NYC. I was walking thru Union Square. A jackass was putting up a big banner that said "Stop Bush". The "S" in Bush was a Swastika. Now, I'm no fan of Bush (settle down), but I told the guy the Swastika was incredibly offensive. ME: "You saying the USofA is a Fascist state ie Nazi Germany?" HIM:"Yes". I walked away as he screamed at me. Across the street I run into "Jews for peace" or something like that. IMHO opinion they have the blood of innocent people on their hands. I told them so. They yelled at me (as opposed to TO me). I walked away again. Ruined my day.

I read this site almost everyday. Tho posters are able to back up their opinions with intelligent comments that reflect a knowledge of history. The views of people who actually serve(d) in the military is also a welcome viewpoint. I don't agree with everything, but I can least respect the opposing position. I was raised a liberal (small "L") Jew. Married a girl raised Catholic. My father in law is an ex marine. My brother in law is gay. And everybody gets along! I think this mix of people enables me to be somewhat objective and see how things play out in the "Real" world.
That's all....
Posted by: pill   2003-10-24 1:11:13 PM  

#17  The objective of this whining from the fifth column is simply to force the implementation of new rules that will make it easier for their terrorist friends to conceal weapons on children. The Left has already institutionalized the inviolability of mosques and other "holy sites", allowing their exploitation as arsenals and terrorist sanctuaries.
It is the terrorists and their hypocritical swine apologists who exploit and abuse children, just as they desecrate holy sites with weapons caches.
There is nothing peaceful about peace activists. They are not dupes or naive fools, they are ruthless power-seeking hypocrites and murder-apologists whose every pronouncement is calculated to assist the totalitarian enemy.
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2003-10-24 1:00:22 PM  

#16  Why don't they also tell about an 11 year old kid with explosives who killed several Israeli soldiers when they let him approach them as he was crying. That occured in Jenin so why should it be any different in Bagdad?
Posted by: Barry   2003-10-24 12:45:40 PM  

#15  One thing the picture does show is that it's not the Afghan kid who's humping a 65-pound pack 5,000 miles from home.
Posted by: Matt   2003-10-24 12:34:57 PM  

#14  "A secretly taken picture of an American soldier frisking an Afghan child has shocked human rights campaigners across the world."

Agreed, Dar. Only a complete moron would think frisking's something you do only to people over a certain age. You frisk because you're looking for concealed items. It follows that the concealee will conceal those items where they're least likely to be discovered. If the friskers aren't frisking the kiddies, they'll conceal the items on the kiddies. unless they're as stupid as our Yvonne.

The woman's on another planet.
Posted by: Bulldog   2003-10-24 12:29:17 PM  

#13  Rachel (Saint Pancake) Corrie.

HA! That's a good one.
Posted by: Charles   2003-10-24 12:05:18 PM  

#12  What makes some of you think that the child is not being frisked? It'd be a ridiculous breach of security not to frisk *everyone*, regardless of age or sex.

"Here, my desert flower, stick this plastique in your burqua. Mahmoud Jr. will carry the fuses and detonators. I'll collect it back from you once we pass the checkpoint."

This still pic means nothing. Video would have been more convincing. If the soldier playfully frisks the kid, so the kid thinks it's more just a fun game, it wouldn't be so bad. But then that wouldn't promote Yvonne's agenda, would it?
Posted by: Dar   2003-10-24 12:03:33 PM  

#11  Fred. Yeah, I knew that, but it's funny how AlJiz and the lovely Yvonne never bring that up. Classic lefty propaganda.
Posted by: tu3031   2003-10-24 11:36:13 AM  

#10  disregard my last about the pic...I see it now. Can't tell by the resolution if its real deal or just the guys playing w/the kids.
Posted by: Jarhead   2003-10-24 11:24:04 AM  

#9  I added the pic into the article. I also moved it from Afghanistan to Fifth Column. The guys involved are more than Monday-morning quarterbacks. Al-Sirri is an active player, and not on our side.
Posted by: Fred   2003-10-24 11:19:47 AM  

#8  Robert & Bill, you gents are probably right. I've been unable to download the picture so I can't tell. However, my thoughts regarding Ansiri & Saalakhan still stand. I hate listening to Monday morning quarterbacks (some guy behind a desk w/a cup of starbucks in a warm office) when it comes to military ops. It's never good practice to second-guess the commander on the scene unless you've been there.
Posted by: Jarhead   2003-10-24 11:16:33 AM  

#7  I can tell you what happened. The kids saw the troops frisking the adults and playfully told our guys to "hey, fwisk me too". And when the soldier playfully padded the kid down, some photographer snapped the pic to show how evil we are.
Posted by: Bill   2003-10-24 10:57:56 AM  

#6  I'd bet that the "frisking" wasn't really a security measure, but rather a joke. You know that kids like it when adults treat them just like other adults; I can see the same thing applying here.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2003-10-24 10:48:00 AM  

#5  Mr.Ansiri & Mr.Saalakhan can go suck the big one. Cry me a river pansies. Whey they get on point and lead a patrol through an un-friendly village looking for hostiles then they can talk. Until then I suggest they know their roles and shut their mouths. We are utilizing our experiences from Viet Nam, if they don't like it, f*ck'em.

"It is quite possible tragedies could unfold if trigger-nervous US soldiers look at these children as potential security risks."

-we don't get 'trigger-nervous', but we do get 'trigger-happy' if some a-hole is turning some 9-yr old into the tnt mule of Kabul.
Posted by: Jarhead   2003-10-24 10:43:50 AM  

#4  Forget for a moment the frightful mistreatment of women and children that daily go on in the countries that comprise most of Al-Jazeera's viewership. Look simply at today's NYT story about the fairly commonplace gang-rapes that occur in that bastion of Liberte, France, and puzzle as to how the moral all-stars of the "human rights community" can knot their knickers over something as benign as this.
Posted by: af   2003-10-24 10:26:46 AM  

#3  We need the high resolution one to see the smiles and coats.
Posted by: Shipman   2003-10-24 10:18:41 AM  

#2  Jeez why are the kids smiling?

Perhaps its the new coat?
Posted by: Anonymous   2003-10-24 10:16:38 AM  

#1  So... when will Al-Jitzz show pictures of Saddam's ( or the Taliban's) mass graves?

Thought not....
Posted by: CrazyFool   2003-10-24 10:13:56 AM  

00:00