You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Middle East
Qurei resists US over fighters
2003-10-07
The Palestinian prime minister says he will not risk a civil war by cracking down on armed groups, while the US says it will judge Ahmad Qurei by his willingness to confront them.
Lost that one already, hasn't he?
Qurei's comments on Monday came one day after President Yasir Arafat declared a state of emergency in Palestinian territories and approved an eight-member cabinet. "We are facing an abnormal situation. There is a state of chaos that should be confronted," he told Reuters. But he insisted he would use persuasion, not force, to stop attacks against Israel. "There won't be a civil war, (I will do it) through dialogue. There won't be martial law".
First y'gotta get their attention, Ahmed...
Qurei says he wants a truce with Israel but the Jewish state has ruled this out until the Palestinian Authority takes action against groups such as Hamas and Islamic Jihad.
We saw the corpses resulting from the last "truce."
The Palestinian premier also reiterated his criticism of resistance attacks in Israel. "This gives the Israeli side a justification to steal land under the pretext of security, kill under the pretext of security and expand settlements under the pretext of security. So there is a state of chaos that cannot be tolerated." Qurei did not give further details or say when he would hold talks with the Palestinian groups.
We'll get around to it. Some day."
Posted by:Fred Pruitt

#6  haaretz "Nasser Yousef, who had been
tapped to be interior minister,
and Jawad Tibi, the designated
health minister, refused to
participate in the swearing-in
ceremony in front of Arafat due
to a dispute over the scope of
their authority"
Posted by: liberalhawk   2003-10-7 12:18:59 PM  

#5  spot - i fear you are spot on.

others - seems the strategy is to continue to make arafat irrelevant, Instead of focusing on Arafat, go after terror masters in Syria. This seems like a good idea, weaken the outside supporters and use that to shift power balance in territories. Also seems very much like this strategy has been worked out together between Israelis and White House. Avoids negative political blowback to both Israel and US of hitting Pals, and puts pressure on Syria not only wrt Pals, but wrt Iraq.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2003-10-7 11:49:39 AM  

#4  RC is right on that one. Arafass has no intention of actually forming a Palestinian state - that would deprive him (and the rest of the Arab world) of his enemy. Apparently, having enemies to jihad against is more important than prosperity, peace, etc. etc.
Posted by: Spot   2003-10-7 9:03:15 AM  

#3  Lost that one already, hasn't he?

You're assuming he ever meant to do anything.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2003-10-7 7:05:00 AM  

#2  Hmmm... are we in a wait them out seige mode here? How many governments does Yasser have to go through before he gets tossed out? (of a high altitude aircraft over the Med. "Oops, I was just showing him what this baby could do, I guess he did not have his seat belt on.")
Posted by: Ben   2003-10-7 5:48:53 AM  

#1  The only thing "abnormal" here is that the US continues to throttle the Israeli response and waste so much effort in treating the Paleos as if they were capable of uniting behind anything except the destruction of Israel and killing Jews. There is no leadership worthy of the word in Paleodom. So much wasted motion and goodwill.

Insincere and disingenuous rhetoric is all that they have to offer in compensation for their blind bloodlust. Repay in kind, tenfold. A relentless campaign to generate car-swarm opportunites is appropriate. Rinse. Repeat. Rinse. Repeat. Etc.
Posted by: .com   2003-10-7 5:48:01 AM  

00:00