You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front
Yes! Backers pressure Gore to run again next year
2003-07-30
via Drudge
Former Vice-President Al Gore is coming under pressure from political supporters and friends to jump into the 2004 presidential campaign even though he ruled himself out in December.
Ohfergawdsake.
Gore’s spokesperson denied that there was any change of plans, but a former Democratic National Committee official close to Gore told The Hill he believes the former vice president may enter the Democratic primary this fall. A second Gore confidant, Steve Armistead, a local Tennessee government official, said: “I think he’d like to grit his teeth and jump back in, but I can’t speak for him. I don’t think he liked the medicine he got from the Supreme Court.”
Truth Serum gave him a bad reaction huh?
Armistead, a good friend of Gore’s for more than 40 years, said Gore has not indicated to him whether he would run. But he added: “I’ve had a lot of people that know him real well tell me that he ought to get back in. I hear it daily. ‘He got out too soon.’ ‘I wish Al never got out of the race.’”
"I wish Al was in Samoa... I wish space aliens would disintegrate him..."
Talk of Gore joining the race could be a trial balloon to test the atmosphere for a 2004 White House run. Gore lost in 2000 to George W. Bush in an election finally decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.
"Selected not elected" = "We weren't able to manipulate and machinate them into picking our guy"
The former DNC official, who was active in Gore’s 2000 campaign, said his prediction of another Gore campaign is based on more than a hunch. But he declined to offer specific evidence.
Hey! This time run on your national security creds? Have Hillary and Bill campaign with you? The possibilities are endless as will be the fun
"I was responsible for the creation of the United States Army..."
He believes, as other Gore confidants do, that the political climate has changed significantly since December, making Bush more vulnerable to defeat in his bid for a second term. “Things have dramatically changed since his announcement,” said the official. “Bush has lied to the country, no one is articulating a foreign policy that’s resonating.”
Uday and Qusay are stuffed and mounted. Idi Amin's on his death bed. Chuck's about to disappear. The French are eating crow in a delicious sauce made from unsold wine...
However, Kiki McLean, Gore’s spokesperson, denied the possibility that her boss would declare his candidacy, adding his name to the nine already declared candidates and automatically moving into their front ranks. “He is not a candidate for president, he’s made his position known and he has no intention of changing his mind,” said McLean.
"Despite his demeanor, he's bright enough to realize that he'd probably lose more states than we actually have in the Union. All the Bushies would have to do is ask people what Al would have done September 12th..."
Surveys show that Gore would have a good chance of capturing the nomination, even if he entered the race only a few months before the nation’s first primary next January in New Hampshire. A Time/CNN poll conducted between May 21 and 22 showed that if Gore changed his mind and ran for president, 40 percent of Democrats and Independents who lean Democratic nationwide would vote for him. The Democratic runners-up, Sen. Joe Lieberman (Conn.), Sen. John Kerry (Mass.), and Rep. Dick Gephardt (Mo.), would each draw 7 percent of that vote. A Washington Post-ABC News poll from mid-July showed that Bush’s support has dropped sharply amid growing concerns of U.S. casualties in Iraq and questions over whether the administration exaggerated Iraq’s efforts to acquire weapons of mass destruction. Yet Democrats so far have failed to capitalize on Bush’s potential weakness. A new poll commissioned by the centrist Democratic Leadership Council shows that the Democratic Party is losing support among white men.
That's because they generically dislike white men.
A USA Today/Gallup Poll released yesterday shows that no more than 20 percent of the voters likely to pull the Democratic lever back any of the declared candidates. The fluid situation has apparently kept a core group of Democratic fundraisers who played key roles in Gore’s 2000 campaign to remain aloof from the current candidates despite being courted intensely. A former Gore campaign aide who surveyed fundraising data on politicalmoneyline.com noted that nine Gore supporters — eight of whom served as finance chairman, or deputy finance chairman at the DNC during the 2000 election — have by and large sat out of the Democratic primary. Two of the three persons who had served as finance chairmen at the DNC in 2000 have contributed to presidential candidates, but otherwise remain uninvolved. Carol Pensky has given $2,000 to Kerry and Joel Hyatt has given $2,000 to Lieberman this year. Hyatt said in an e-mail that he’s too busy to become more involved. The third finance chairman, Joe Cari, has yet to give to any of the candidates. Of the fundraisers who served as deputy finance chairs at the DNC during Gore’s run, Pamela Eakes has given $750 to former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, Christopher Korge has given $2,000 to Sen. Bob Graham (D-Fla.) and Alan Kessler has given $1,500 to Lieberman. Ken Jarin and Peter Knight have yet to give. In interviews, Eakes and Kessler said they are not yet committed to a candidate. Another Gore official, who also worked on the 1996 and 2000 campaigns, said: “These folks are playing in a non-material, insignificant way. These were the top fundraisers for Gore and the party in 2000 and they are basically keeping their wallets shut and more importantly not asking their friends [and] colleagues to help with an ’04 candidate.”
trial balloon going up to see the reaction.
Posted by:Frank G

#9  Please Al! This is tooo much! I just want to grab a cooler full of beer and watch the returns. Seeing Dan Rather sad face as he says 'CBS is predicting that the Republicans will gain seats in the House/Senate AND retain the White House. Switching to ABC in time to see Peter to start crying. Surfing over to NBC we see Tom calling out "Mommy" and then goes into the fetal position. CNN will run a Special 'Cuba the new paradise'. MSNBC will air an interview of EU member who will tell us why 'Your system Sucks'. ON E! the cast of West Wing, Will & Grace, and most of the Hollywood elite are taking their private Jets to France (where they can live free). PLEASE OH PLEASE AL RUN AGAIN!
Posted by: Cyber Sarge (VRWC CA Chapter)   2003-7-30 6:55:31 PM  

#8  The Republicans just need to dig up a few quotes from just after 9/11 when a few big Dems said they were kind of glad Gore wasn't in power.
Posted by: Yank   2003-7-30 3:51:15 PM  

#7  liberalhawk How many other hands do you have?

dorf
Posted by: Anonymous   2003-7-30 3:19:28 PM  

#6  I think the lesson here is that none of the present contenders are exactly knocking it out of the park.
Posted by: Matt   2003-7-30 2:14:22 PM  

#5  To Algore: Please oh please oh please run again!
Posted by: SPQR 2755   2003-7-30 2:09:49 PM  

#4  Could this be why the Bush admin is holding off giving an answer on WMD?

Holding his hole card till all bets/raises are in? A dumb cowboy like GWBush? That would be a lot like a game I know called Texas Hold 'Em (probably a coincidence...)
Posted by: Frank G   2003-7-30 1:29:51 PM  

#3  well the ideal positioning for Gore should be somewhere between Edwards and Gephardt - more populist than mainstream DLC, but not protectionist like Gephardt, and without actually committing to large govt programs, like Gephardt's health insurance plan. OTOH his "hawkish" opposition to the Iraq war seems close to the Bob Graham position - OTOH Graham doesnt seem to be going anywhere. On the other hand i think every dem other than Edwards and Lieberman is falling into the WMD trap, and i cant see Gore escaping it. It hurts a centrist like him or Gephardt worse than it hurts Dean, since his hardcore will stay with him even after WMD are found. OTOH maybe he will avoid commenting on Iraq till its clear which way things are gonna fall - then go one way or the other. On the other hand if he waits too long it will be too late. Could this be why the Bush admin is holding off giving an answer on WMD?
Posted by: liberalhawk   2003-7-30 1:18:06 PM  

#2  Don't forget, kids, his announcement that he would sit out '04 came after he and Tipper released their book, went on all the morning shows, geared up into full publicity blitz mode . . . and the thing sank like a stone.

Gore's moment came and went.
Posted by: Mike   2003-7-30 12:54:21 PM  

#1  Prince Al is sooooo 20th century.
Posted by: Anonymous   2003-7-30 12:42:04 PM  

00:00