You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Fifth Column
We went to war just to boost the white male ego
2003-04-29
Looks like Norm got into the mushrooms again...or he's gone completely insane. I'd edit it, but you really have to read it all.
Norman Mailer
With their dominance in sport, at work and at home eroded, Bush thought white American men needed to know they were still good at something. That's where Iraq came in...
It did?
Exeunt: lightning and thunder, shock and awe. Dust, ash, fog, fire, smoke, sand, blood, and a good deal of waste now moves to the wings.
Yes! Yes! Begone with you! Out, out, damned lightning and thunder, damned shock and awe, damned spot!
The stage, however, remains occupied. The question posed at curtain-rise has not been answered. Why did we go to war?
I dunno. Couldn't get a date? Nothing good on teevee and nothing to read that wasn't pretentious posing by drunks who could write 50 years ago?
If no real weapons of mass destruction are found, the question will keen in pitch. Or, if more likely, such weapons are uncovered in Iraq — not a tenth, not a hundredth of what we possess — but, yes, if such weapons are there, it is also likely that even more have been moved to new hiding places beyond Iraq. If that is so, horrific events could ensue. Should they take place, we can count on a predictable response: “Good, honest, innocent Americans died today because of evil al-Qaeda terrorists.”
Could even be bad, dishonest ones. Murder's still murder, ain't it? Unless it's a political act, of course, promulgated by a White Negro™...
Yes, we will hear the President’s voice speaking before he even utters such words. (For those of us who do not like George Bush, we may as well recognise that putting up with him in the Oval Office is like being married to a mate who always says exactly what you know in advance he or she is going to say, which also helps to account for why the other half of America loves him.)
Sounds kinda like a description of Norman Mailer there, doesn't it? I guess it's all about Norm, when you come down to it...
The key question remains — why did we go to war? It is not yet answered.
Y'know, Natalie Maines was just trying to figure that out the other day. Maybe you should ask her...
In the end, it is likely that a host of responses will produce a cognitive stew, which does, at least, open the way to offering one’s own notion. We went to war, I could say, because we very much needed a war. The US economy was sinking, the market was gloomy and down, and some classic bastions of the erstwhile American faith (corporate integrity, the FBI, and the Catholic Church, to cite but three) had each suffered a separate and grievous loss of face. Since our Administration was probably not ready to solve any one of the serious problems before it, it was natural to feel the impulse to move into larger ventures, thrusts into the empyrean-war!
Mmmmm! Cognitive stew! My favorite! Throw in a few more carrots of coherence this time, though, okay, Norm?
Be it said that the Administration knew something a good many of us did not — it knew that we had a very good, perhaps even an extraordinarily good, if essentially untested, group of Armed Forces, a skilled, disciplined, well-motivated military, career-focused and run by a field-rank and general staff who were intelligent, articulate, and considerably less corrupt than any other power group in America. In such a pass, how could the White House not use them?
Maybe the same way they didn't use them previously? Naw. That can't be right...
They could prove quintessential as morale-builders to one group in US life, perhaps the key group: the white American male. If once this aggregate came near to 50 per cent of the population, it was down to . . . was it now 30 per cent? Still, it remained key to the President’s political footing. And it had taken a real beating. As a matter of collective ego, the good white American male had had very little to nourish his morale since the job market had gone bad, unless he happened to be in the Armed Forces. There, it was certainly different. The Armed Forces had become the paradigmatic equal of a great young athlete looking to test his true size. Could it be that there was a bozo out in the boondocks who was made to order, and his name was Iraq? Iraq had a tough rep, but he was old and a blowhard. A choice opponent. A desert war with no caves in sight is designed for an air force whose state-of-the-art is comparable in perfection to a top-flight fashion model on a runway.
He's equating Warthogs with Naomi Campbell? He does have an imagination, doesn't he?
So Iraq was chosen. Our good people on high would rush to claim that our putative foe possessed a nuclear threat. Along the way, they presented President Saddam Hussein as the closet architect of 9/11. Then they declared that he ran a nest of terrorists. None of that held up on close examination but it did not have to. We were ready to go to war anyway. After 9/11, and the absence of Osama bin Laden’s body in Afghanistan or anywhere else, why not choose Saddam as the evil force behind the fall of the twin towers? We would liberate the Iraqis. Wantonly, shamelessly, proudly, exuberantly, one half of our prodigiously divided America could hardly wait for the new war. We understood that our television was going to be terrific. And it was. Sanitised but terrific — which is, after all, exactly what network and good cable television are supposed to be.
The other half of our prodigiously divided America, in the meanwhile, was jumping up and down and making faces and building papiermache puppets and walking on stilts and getting naked in public. Except for Norm, who seems to have been drinking...
There were, however, even better reasons for using our military skills, but these reasons return us to the ongoing malaise of the white American male. He had been taking a daily drubbing over the past 30 years. For better or worse, the women’s movement had had its breakthrough successes and the old, easy white male ego had withered in the glare. Even the mighty consolations of rooting for your team on TV had been skewed. There was now less reward in watching sports than there used to be, a clear and declarable loss. The great white stars of yesteryear were for the most part gone, gone in football, in basketball, in boxing, and half-gone in baseball. Black genius now prevailed in all these sports (and the Hispanics were coming up fast; even the Asians were beginning to make their mark).
How 'bout that? Norm's discovered the Black Negro™. He'll no doubt write about about it...
We white men were now left with half of tennis (at least its male half), and might also point to ice-hockey, skiing, soccer, golf, (with the notable exception of the Tiger) as well as lacrosse, swimming, and the World-Wide Wrestling Federation — remnants and orts of a once-great and glorious centrality.
He's lamenting the decline of the Knickerbocker and the Episcopalian? All that's left is the WWF and a few remnants and orts...
On the other hand, the good white American male still had the Armed Forces. If blacks and Hispanics were numerous there, still they were not a majority, and the officer corps, (if the TV was a reliable witness), suggested that the percentage of white men increased as one rose in rank to the higher officers. Moreover, we had knock-out tank echelons, Super-Marines, and — one magical ace in the hole — the best air force that ever existed. If we cannot find our machismo anywhere else, we can certainly settle in on the interface between combat and technology. Let me then advance the offensive suggestion that this may have been one of the cardinal reasons we went looking for war. We knew we were likely to be good at it.
Hokay. Explain why Sammy went looking for the other half of the tango. Let me advance the offensive suggestion that Sammy knew he was likely to get his cheeks blown off, and rather than backing down or even acting reasonable, he kept getting more and more bellicose. Did that have something to do with recent attacks by feminism on moustachioed Arab male self-image? Or is it just another ort?
In the course, however, of all the quick events of the past few weeks, our military went through a transmogrification. Indeed, it was one hellion of a morph. We went from a potentially great athlete into a master surgeon capable of operating at high speed on an awfully sick patient. Now, even as the patient is being stitched up, a new and troubling question arises: have any fresh medicines been developed to deal with what seem to be teeming infections? Do we really know how to treat livid suppurations we were not quite prepared for?
Best way to treat livid suppurations like that is to debrede them, apply topical antibiotics, administer same by mouth, and cover the wound to keep foreign matter out. Or you could just slap on a mustard plaster and hope for the best...
Or would it be better to ignore the consequences? Mightn’t we keep trusting our great American luck, our faith in our divinely protected can-do luck? We are, by custom, gung-ho. If these suppurations prove to be unmanageable, or just too time-consuming, may we not leave them behind? We could move on to the next venue. Syria, we might declare in our best John Wayne voice: You can run, but you can’t hide.
Or we could say in our best Wally Cox voice, "Oooow! That huuuuurt!" Guess which one I'd prefer, Pilgrim?
Saudi Arabia, you over-rated tank of blubber, are you out of gas? And Iran, watch it, we have eyes for you. You could be our next real meal. Because when we are feeling this good, we are ready to go, and go again. We must. We have had a real taste. Why, there’s a basket-full of billions to be made in the Middle East just so long as we stay ahead of the trillions of debt that are coming after us.
Hmmm... Important and profound lessons in cost effectiveness here. Lemme make a note...
Be it said: the motives that lead to a nation’s major historical acts can probably rise no higher than the spiritual understanding of its leadership. While George W. may not know as much as he believes he knows about the dispositions of God’s blessing, he is driving us at high speed all the same. He is more of a white male by at least an order of magnitude than any other boyo in America, yes, we have this man at the wheel whose most legitimate boast might be that he knew how to parlay the part-ownership of a major-league baseball team into a gubernatorial win in Texas. And — shall we ever forget? — was catapulted, thereafter, into a mighty hymn: All Hail to the Chief!
Now who can argue with that?
Posted by:tu3031

#21  Is it just me or is anyone else noticing that leftist nuts like this washed up novelist are totally obsessed with sexual issues? It's always there...just wondering.
Posted by: R. McLeod   2003-04-30 03:24:38  

#20  Mailer is now 80 years old, a literary corpse preserved in alcohol, one whose last original thought lies half a century in the past. He is also responsible for one of the most racist screeds of the 1950s, a little essay entitled The White Negro. Of course, Mailer did not realize that it was racist, he was trying to praise what he saw as a lifestyle of indulgence, irresponsibility, and sensuality.

Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2003-04-29 23:12:06  

#19  tu3031: Yeah, I know about the Belly of the Beast and its aftermath. I didn't want to bring it up here since I felt that the wife stabbing was damning enough. There must be a special place in hell for narcissitic punks like Mailer. Even scarier than Mailer is the reception he gets from the privilegenstia in this country -- a sociopathic alchoholic being adulated by the jaded elites. Whenever I read about him and his circle, I feel like I've just walked into a room full of decadents watching a snuff film.
Posted by: 11A5S   2003-04-29 23:04:08  

#18  11A5S.Since you're researching this literary giant, look up the name Jack Henry Abbott. That'll really turn your stomach...
Posted by: tu3031   2003-04-29 22:22:58  

#17  This may seem a bit off-topic, and God help me for changing the subject in this manner, but does anyone else get the impression that this guy is doing the "tuck between the legs" dance in front of a mirror in his best lingiere??? For all of his 'white, male ego' talk, he seems ashamed to be a 'white male'?

Last time I checked, being a white male in and of itself was not a crime, for anything to be ashamed of... now, being a white, male dumba%S!@... thats something I have no truck with...

Posted by: Steve W.   2003-04-29 22:12:38  

#16  Is he trying to be like Hunter S Thompson here? He's got the incoherence down, he's got the substance abuse, but it still fails miserably.
Any guesses on what his blood alcohol content was when he wrote this? I'd say about .25. Most of us would have been passed out before we reach that, but considering his history of drinking, I'm sure he was somewhere around that level.
Posted by: Baba Yaga   2003-04-29 20:49:57  

#15  I'm a white male and my ego is just fine, even without the war.
Posted by: Hiryu   2003-04-29 20:04:48  

#14  tu3031: We're both wrong. It was only attempted homicide. Though it does seem like he definitely knows what it's like to have his white male ego bruised.

In 1960, during a boisterous all-night party at their West 94th Street apartment, Mailer stabbed his second wife Adele with a "dirty three-inch penknife" for calling him a "faggot." From her bed in the Intensive Care Unit at University Hospital, the soon-to-be-ex-Mrs. Mailer declined to press charges. But police arrested Mailer for felonious assault. (The week before, he had been arrested for disorderly conduct after he was refused credit for a $7.60 liquor bill at Birdland, a jazz nightclub.)
Given a suspended sentence, Mailer was committed to Bellevue Hospital for observation. "It's important for me not be sent to a mental hospital," Mailer protested, "because my work will be considered that of a disordered mind. My pride is that I can explore areas of experience that other men are afraid of. I insist I am sane."
Posted by: 11A5S   2003-04-29 18:03:04  

#13  Mailer himself said it best: "I've made an ass of myself so many times I think I must be one." (Interview with NYT Review of Books, 1991 or so)
Posted by: Sofia   2003-04-29 17:39:03  

#12  Be It said? Boyo, thats it I am never having another drink in my life...Thanks Norm
Posted by: Wills   2003-04-29 17:04:25  

#11  Just when I get pissed off at the intolerant wing of the Republican party - e.g., Santorum's comments of last week - I am reminded why I can NEVER vote for liberal Democrats who represent the leading liberal thinkers such as this boob.
Posted by: ColoradoConservative   2003-04-29 16:17:24  

#10  11A5S. Actually, I think the wife tried to kill him. Can't say that I blame her.
Posted by: tu3031   2003-04-29 15:59:31  

#9  Hi, I'm Norman Mailer's liver. Yes, I know, you thought I was dead. Well, I ought to be, all the alcohol he's ran through me over the years. But, I got friends and connections, and that helps. Gore Vidal's prostate, good friend. Cell phone's always on. Then there's Helen Thomas's vagina. What can I say? If it can manage, so can I. We cry on eachother's shoulder a LOT, I tell you, a LOT.

more
Posted by: Chuck   2003-04-29 15:52:25  

#8  Norm's always made me think of a prolonged belch, all noise and odor...
Posted by: Fred   2003-04-29 14:32:16  

#7  Neither amusing nor thought-provoking. Just another pathetic celebrity loser.
Posted by: Tom   2003-04-29 14:00:24  

#6  When Norman Mailers reputation as a reputable author of renown eroded, he thought he needed to feel he was still good at something. Thats where the keyboard came in. Bashing away at the keyboard, hurling small-minded, indefensible, irrational phrases into the atmosphere boosted his white male ego. I'm glad he feels better now, but for the sane, adult world, we realize what a mean-spirited emotionally-stunted adolescent he is. By the way Norman, you have to earn the right to Mister, if no one has ever pointed this out to you, chronological age has nothing to do with maturity. Your abilty to string sentences together without once coming close to a coherent, reasonable or mature conclusion, gives full credence to that truism.
Posted by: Carolyn   2003-04-29 13:56:17  

#5  Sheesh, what an @$$h@t
Posted by: Rex Mundi   2003-04-29 13:32:39  

#4  "For those of us who do not like George Bush, we may as well recognise that putting up with him in the Oval Office is like being married to a mate who always says exactly what you know in advance he or she is going to say,..."

This may go a long way towards explaining why he killed his first wife.
Posted by: 11A5S   2003-04-29 13:29:57  

#3  Mail Mailer somewhere.
Posted by: KP   2003-04-29 13:12:51  

#2  This guy's a pathetic jerkoff. He used to be known for getting drunk and picking fistfights with people, so I guess he'd know all about uncontrolled machismo and senseless aggression. Don't we have an Institute for Horses' Asses where we can put all these people? Didn't Norman Mailer also befriend murderer Gary Gilmore and try to make him look like a victim? If Norman Mailer told me it was raining, I'd have to look out the window and check.
Posted by: Joe   2003-04-29 12:08:33  

#1  And this from a guy who once punched Gore Vidal. You GO, girl!

Posted by: FormerLiberal   2003-04-29 12:02:47  

00:00