You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Korea
NK Wants Japan, Russia Excluded From Talks
2003-04-14
Despite North Korea's apparent warming toward the notion of multilateral dialogue to resolve its nuclear standoff with the United States, any such discussion is likely to be held back by arguments over which countries to include. South Korea prefers the so-called "two plus four" model, featuring the two Koreas, the United States, China, Japan and Russia. But North Korea and China are opposing the participation of Japan and Russia, insisting that they are not directly related to security on the Korean Peninsula. "The North sees no reason for Japan and Russia to join the multilateral talks because it wants to discuss the abolition of the armistice pact and the signing of a non-aggression pact with the United States during the forum," said a ranking official at the Foreign Ministry.

The armistice agreement, which ended the 3-year Korean War in 1953, was signed by four combatants - UN, US, North Korea and China. "Instead, the North wants the European Union (EU) to participate in the multilateral forum in an apparent hope that EU may play a leading role in providing economic aid to Pyongyang," an official said. Seoul officials have said the multilateral talks, if opened, will incorporate not only the North's nuclear arms program but also the international community's economic support to the destitute communist country. The United States has wanted a broader multilateral setting to include both Koreas, five permanent members of the UN Security Council, Australia, Canada and EU. But Seoul officials said the North is uncomfortable with such a format.

Washington persistently rejected Pyongyang's demand for direct negotiations to address the nuclear standoff and discuss other security issues. In a significant turnaround, North Korea said Saturday it would consider any form of dialogue with the United States if Washington agrees on discussions about economic aid and security assurances. South Korea and the United States welcomed the North's softening of its demand for the bilateral talks, regarding it as a positive development in resolving the nuclear issue.

The nuclear dispute started after the United States said last October that the North admitted to having a nuclear program using enriched uranium. Since then, the North has expelled UN inspectors monitoring sealed nuclear reactors, declared that it was withdrawing from the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and has begun to reactivate its nuclear plant. Pyongyang's changes in attitude came days after the US-led forces toppled the Saddam Hussein regime in a war which South Korean President Roh Moo-hyun said had "petrified" the North.

Like I say, each success is going to make subsequent successes easier. Two weeks ago the NKors were frothing at the mouth and threatening seas of fire. Today, they're frothing at the mouth and demanding negotiations.
Posted by:george

#8  mhw -- Why? So Kimmie and de Villepin can compare hair gel? ;)
Posted by: Baba Yaga   2003-04-14 18:36:51  

#7  before Iraq - Nkor wanted only bilateral talks with the US.

Now - Nkor wants to make sure Japan and Russia excluded from mulilateral talks, willing to let Chinese in, aligning with Chinese position.

Things are working - more pressure on China may help.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2003-04-14 13:38:01  

#6  I only remembered it because I saw an extremely depressing - and now infuriating - "Frontline" documentary on Thursday. The gist was that while the Carter/Clinton bribe was remarkable for its stupidity, cravenness, and inability to actually be implemented fully, the current attitudes of the Bush administration towards NK removes the almost transparent patina of safety and security that the bribe purchased for us, which is why the Carter/Clinton fellatio of Kim is still better than Bush's refusal to get on his knees.

One astouding political benefit of the Iraq war has been all the interesting worms that have exploded out of the proverbial can. I wonder what we'll find in NK?
Posted by: FormerLiberal   2003-04-14 11:32:48  

#5  FormerLib - I'd forgotten that, thx for reminding me lol
Posted by: Frank G   2003-04-14 11:25:31  

#4  You know, that creepy little hobbit once wanted to be a filmaker so badly that he had a director kidnapped; it was more convenient than calling, I suppose. So here's what we do - we continue to bribe Kim, but we make our payments in filmakers. Think about it: Michael Moore, Barbara Streisand, heck, we could even finally get rid of Kevin Costner. It's frikkin' brilliant.
Posted by: FormerLiberal   2003-04-14 10:26:49  

#3  Just for laughs the US should insist that France attend the talks with China, SK, NK and us.
Posted by: mhw   2003-04-14 09:43:38  

#2  Someone else sees the "Axis of Weasels" as a bunch of "useful idiots". Do they really think the United States will subject itself to the decisions made primarily by the two countries that caused it so much grief in Iraq? We need to keep the pressure on Kimmie, he's beginning to sweat. Maybe he'll lose some of that paunch he's gained, living like a king while his people ate grass.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2003-04-14 09:34:17  

#1  The silent treatment seems to be working, so let's keep it up. And Kimmie's so scared that he's been burrowing to...well, let me check my globe...uh, burrowing to Bolivia, it looks like.
Posted by: (lowercase) matt   2003-04-14 09:28:59  

00:00