You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Straw: UN resolution bid may be abandoned before war
2003-03-12
Following up Spain's hints earlier...
Jack Straw has acknowledged that Britain may have to abandon hopes of securing a new United Nations resolution before going to war with Iraq. At a news conference at the Foreign Office, he repeatedly refused to say whether the draft resolution tabled by Britain, the US and Spain would be put to a vote in the Security Council.

Earlier, his Spanish counterpart Ana Palacio openly accepted that the resolution may be withdrawn, citing the threat by President Jacques Chirac to wield the French veto "whatever the circumstances". The acceptance that the resolution may have to be dropped will have come as a blow to Tony Blair, who desperately needs a new UN mandate for war if he is to avoid a split in the Labour Party. Earlier, at Prime Minister's Questions, Mr Blair had assured Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith that he still intended to put the resolution to a vote in the Security Council. He even announced a series of six "benchmarks" against which Iraqi compliance with UN demands to disarm could be judged in a final attempt to win round the undecided council members. But just five hours later, Mr Straw refused to guarantee that there would be a vote on a new resolution before military action was launched. "What I guarantee is that we are working as hard as we possibly can to secure a second resolution," he said. "We are having to do so in circumstances in which one of the the permanent members of the Security Council has said, whatever the circumstances, they will veto a resolution, so that is not easy. He added that they were in a "very fast moving situation".
A UN showdown would have been nice, but it seems the talking really is over. BBC news this evening were predicting war by Monday, and the British military still set to go :).
Posted by:Bulldog

#4  Yeah I'm starting to come around to not forcing a vote on the 18th resolution. Fuck it. Stop holding things up and just go.
Posted by: g wiz   2003-03-12 21:10:26  

#3  JAB: "very fast moving situation" I think that should be translated from Strawspeak as "What we said a few hours ago about going for the second [sic] resolution: nah! Stuff the frogs, we're going unilaterally [sic]"

it looks like the French and Russians have actually done us a favour by guaranteeing vetoes, as it seems the moral majority is out of our grasp too. We can avoid a potential humiliation (4 to 11), and the blame the French for rendering the UNSC irrelevant (like Frank says)!
Posted by: Bulldog   2003-03-12 17:31:26  

#2  I DO like it - it actually puts the onus on the French for their overt expressions of a veto, while leaving others in the murky grey. We were always going to war, whether the Frogs wanted to or not..now the best thing that could happen is to expose the "contribuions" the french have made to sammy's war machine (bio, chem, nuke - they're all there)
Posted by: Frank G   2003-03-12 17:21:54  

#1  So, the British press is implying that Blair will go without any paper whatsoever from the UN? If so, I am quite surprised based on what we've read in the American press.
Posted by: JAB   2003-03-12 16:39:38  

00:00