| Submit your comments on this article |
| Iraq |
| Senior Democrats accuse CIA of sabotaging inspections |
| 2003-02-13 |
| CIA 'sabotaged inspections and hid weapons details' By Andrew Buncombe in Washington 14 February 2003 Senior democrats weasels have accused the CIA of sabotaging weapons inspections in Iraq by refusing to co-operate fully with the UN and withholding crucial information about Saddam Hussein's arsenal. Sammy won't tell us where they are, and the CIA won't reveal their sensitive info, so of course, in the Dem's mind, it's the CIA's fault Led by Senator Carl Levin, the Democrats accused the CIA of making an assessment that the inspections were unlikely to be a success an opinion shared by everyone with a brain and then ensuring they would not be by not doing Sammy's job for him? . They have accused the CIA director of lying about what information on the suspected location of weapons of mass destruction had been passed on. pretty harsh accusation - and what evidence do you have of that, Mr Levin? The row is of heightened significance given the Bush administration's preparations to argue later today before the UN Security Council that the inspections have run their course and it is now time to move to military action. France, Russia, Germany and other members of the Security Council are likely to back a counter-proposal to increase the number of inspectors, providing them, if necessary, with the support of armed UN soldiers, as a means of avoiding a military strike. a non-starter for so many reasons The accusation of US sabotage emerged from a series of Senate hearings on Capitol Hill. On Tuesday, George Tenet, the CIA director, told the armed services committee panel that the agency had provided the UN inspectors with all the information it had on "high" and "moderate" interest locations inside Iraq – those sites where there was a possibility of finding banned weapons. But Mr Tenet later told a different panel that he had been mistaken and that there were in fact "a handful" of locations the UN inspectors may not have known about. Senator Levin, from Michigan, responded by saying the CIA director had not been telling the truth. Citing a number of classified letters he had obtained from the agency, he said it was clear the CIA had not shared information with the inspectors about a "large number of sites of significant value". because the team of inspectors was infiltrated and surveilled by Iraqi intelligence who would take countermeasures He said the CIA had told him additional information would be passed to the inspectors within the next few days.By us, not Sammy, and that's the rub, isn't it, Senator (D-Moron)? Mr Levin pushed Mr Tenet on whether he thought the inspections had any value. The CIA director replied: "Unless [President Saddam] provides the data to build on, provides the access, provides the unfettered access that he's supposed to, provides us with surveillance capability, there is little chance you're going to find weapons of mass destruction under the rubric he's created inside the country ... The inspectors have been put in a very difficult position by his behaviour. That's the right response Mr Levin said later he believed the CIA had, in effect, taken the decision to undermine the inspections. "When they've taken the position that inspections are useless, they are bound to fail," he told The Washington Post. "We have undermined the inspectors." What an A*%HOLE Mr Levin has raised his concerns with the White House. In a letter to President Bush, the senator asked that America provide the inspectors with as much information as available. Please identify any sources so the Iraqis can He wrote: "The American people want the inspections to proceed, want the United States to share the information we have with the UN inspectors and want us to obtain United Nations support before military action is used against Iraq." 13 February 2003 15:54 |
| Posted by:Frank G |
| #6 i note that the independent calls Levin a "senior democrat" both the far left and the right have a motive to emphasize the centralitiy of this type of position in Democratic politics. I note that of the Dem presidential candidates, Leiberman, Edwards, and Gephardt openly support the admin on Iraq, Kerry does so in his inimitable non-commital way, only Dean and Sharpton are opposed. |
| Posted by: liberalhawk 2003-02-14 08:11:29 |
| #5 What Levin said is so illogical on its face, so knowingly dishonest, so vile that my reaction to it is rage and nothing else. What he's saying is poisonous. Any elected official who agrees with him should be driven from office the next time they're up for reelection. |
| Posted by: Michael Levy 2003-02-13 23:03:06 |
| #4 Dear carl's blubbering last sunday alone qualifies him as the village idiot... dorf |
| Posted by: Anonymous 2003-02-13 20:05:18 |
| #3 No Patrick, you were right the first time. An idiot, but not your average idiot but a true idiotarian of the highest degree. |
| Posted by: Rex Mundi 2003-02-13 18:52:37 |
| #2 You know, on second thought, he's not an idiot. In near future we're going to be showing the world Saddam's rather large WDM stockpile. All the folks who were pinning their hopes on the inspectors will look pretty silly. So what to do? Make it all the fault of the CIA that the inspectors couldn't find anything! If only the mean-old CIA had given the inspectors whatever they wanted, then inspections would have worked and everything would have somehow been sunshine and flowers. |
| Posted by: Patrick Phillips 2003-02-13 18:28:46 |
| #1 Idiot. |
| Posted by: Patrick Phillips 2003-02-13 18:19:06 |