You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Southeast Asia
S.Korea hates being a Small Fry
2002-12-28
South Korea is reluctant to have North Korea’s nuclear challenge dealt with at the UN Security Council, because it will not only mean a prolonged standoff but also reduce its say in resolving a looming crisis, government officials say.
``If the UNSC stepped in, it would mean the situation will drag on,’’ one government official said. ``That scenario runs counter to our wish to see the North’s nuclear program resolved peacefully and as soon as possible.’’

Another official said the involvement of UNSC’s five permanent members _ the United States, China, Russia, France and Britain _ would likely leave little room for Seoul to influence the handling of Pyongyang’s nuclear program. An internal memo by the South Korean Foreign Ministry, however, expected the North’s nuclear challenge would be forwarded for deliberation at the UNSC by the end of January.
We dont care if S.Korea gets nuked, were more worried about who the North is going to sell these materials to.
UNSC is empowered to take a wide range of actions, from the issuance of a resolution to placing trade embargos and authorizing military action.

Seoul is worried it will be shut out from the process of handling the North Korean situation. On Thursday, President Kim Dae-jung said Seoul should take a leading role in the peaceful resolution of the issue, a message government officials say is intended both for Pyongyang, which only looks to the U.S. for dialogue, and for the Bush administration, which insists on its policy of isolating the North.

``We will never make the same mistake of paying billions of dollars for a deal we didn’t participate in,’’ Kim was quoted as saying during a function Monday, referring to the 1994 agreement Pyongyang and Washington struck to defuse a nuclear crisis. Under the 1994 Geneva Agreed Framework, the government is obliged to pay more than $3 billion, about 70 percent of the cost of building two light-water reactors for the North, in exchange for its promise to freeze its uranium-based nuclear program.
But you have made the same mistake time after time, by promoting progams such as your goofy Sunshine Policy.
Posted by:Richard

#1  "If the UNSC stepped in, it would mean the situation will drag on," one government official said.

Huh. Kind of makes one realize just what purpose is served by seeking UN "approval" for the U.S. to act.

Posted by: Bashir Gemayel   2002-12-28 22:47:53  

00:00