Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 06/08/2024 View Fri 06/07/2024 View Thu 06/06/2024 View Wed 06/05/2024 View Tue 06/04/2024 View Mon 06/03/2024 View Sun 06/02/2024
2024-02-25 Science & Technology
One giant tumble for mankind! NASA confirms $118 million Odysseus lunar aircraft has TIPPED OVER onto its side after failed landing on the moon
[Daily Mail, where America gets its news] Wait! There's rocks on the moon?
Big enough to upset the unit's center-of-gravity?
Where there's no gravity?

What balloon head did they outsource the landing dynamics modeling to?
Posted by Skidmark 2024-02-25 00:00|| || Front Page|| [60 views ]  Top

#1 Are we worse at Moon landings than 50 years ago?
Posted by Skidmark 2024-02-24 10:19||   2024-02-24 10:19|| Front Page Top

#2 The system that was supposed to handle the sensing of the terrain during the landing failed prior to insertion. They had to re=task lidar sensors that weren't intended for the task while in orbit around the moon. They almost pulled it off.
Posted by M. Murcek 2024-02-24 11:15||   2024-02-24 11:15|| Front Page Top

#3 Play Lunar Lander

Wiki says:
Lunar Lander (video game genre)
Posted by Skidmark 2024-02-25 06:08||   2024-02-25 06:08|| Front Page Top

#4 iirc the Armstrong mission had to make a last second adjustment of their landing to avoid a boulder.
Posted by Procopius2k 2024-02-25 07:41||   2024-02-25 07:41|| Front Page Top

#5 the Armstrong mission had to make a last second adjustment

Indeed. At the time, there was a faction arguing that we should send robots instead of humans. But humans make pretty good general purpose robots despite being soft and squishy, which allows them to do tricks like dodging last-minute boulders. Our robotic systems are better now, but all the parts still have to work.
Posted by SteveS 2024-02-25 11:03||   2024-02-25 11:03|| Front Page Top

#6 Your tax dollars at work.
Posted by DooDahMan 2024-02-25 11:09||   2024-02-25 11:09|| Front Page Top

#7 but all the parts still have to work

And had the landing carriage been twice the diameter, it would not have fallen.
Posted by Skidmark 2024-02-25 11:20||   2024-02-25 11:20|| Front Page Top

#8 Yeah, why the tall skinny probes..instead of fat squat ones?
Posted by Silentbrick 2024-02-25 15:20||   2024-02-25 15:20|| Front Page Top

19:10 SteveS
18:43 DooDahMan
18:42 DooDahMan
18:39 DooDahMan
18:18 Mullah Richard
18:12 Bobby
17:24 NN2N1
17:24 Classer
17:21 USN, Ret.
17:15 swksvolFF
17:13 HAL
17:08 Canuckistan sniper
16:56 swksvolFF
16:36 Besoeker
16:31 Deacon+Blues
16:30 Gleremble+Bucket3559
16:27 Deacon+Blues
16:16 Super Hose
15:50 swksvolFF
15:49 trailing wife
15:42 trailing wife
15:30 Super Hose
15:27 trailing wife
15:25 Super Hose









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com