Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 06/04/2005 View Fri 06/03/2005 View Thu 06/02/2005 View Wed 06/01/2005 View Tue 05/31/2005 View Mon 05/30/2005 View Sun 05/29/2005
1
2005-06-04 Iraq-Jordan
Iraq Puts Civilian Toll at 12,000
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve White 2005-06-04 00:00|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 and just to keep things in perspective how many did Saddam kill on average?
Posted by 2b 2005-06-04 00:42||   2005-06-04 00:42|| Front Page Top

#2 Here is one estimate:

http://wais.stanford.edu/Iraq/iraq_deathsundersaddamhussein42503.html

Along with other human rights organizations, The Documental Centre for Human Rights in Iraq has compiled documentation on over 600,000 civilian executions in Iraq. Human Rights Watch reports that in one operation alone, the Anfal, Saddam killed 100,000 Kurdish Iraqis. Another 500,000 are estimated to have died in Saddam's needless war with Iran. Coldly taken as a daily average for the 24 years of Saddam's reign, these numbers give us a horrifying picture of between 70 and 125 civilian deaths per day for every one of Saddam's 8,000-odd days in power"

Here's another from a LEFTY site:

http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00000635.htm

Since Saddam took over Iraq in 1979 through his ouster in 2003, he supposedly killed some 300,000 citizens (according to repeated Administration assertions). That's roughly 13,000 deaths per year.

And here is a very detailed accounting:

http://thedeadhand.com/blogs/jscroft/articles/627.aspx

Summary:
Minimum Total 739,815

The above table covers a period of 20 years, from 1983 to 2003. That's 7,300 days. Divide that number into the table results, and you arrive at a daily average of about 101 civilian deaths a day under Saddam Hussein's regime.



Posted by RMcLeod 2005-06-04 01:28||   2005-06-04 01:28|| Front Page Top

#3 But hey, what's 750,000 people? Nothing, apparently, when weighed against the opportunity to attack Bush and slander the United States military.

Today's Left, transported back to 1941 would plainly would have opposed the war against Germany and Japan because WWII claimed innocent lives. They don't give a CRAP about Iraqi lives no matter how obvious it is that tens of thousands have been saved because of what we've done.
Posted by RMcLeod 2005-06-04 01:36||   2005-06-04 01:36|| Front Page Top

#4 Liberals..........Fuck 'em.........Fuck 'em all.
Posted by Unose Whavitle7547 2005-06-04 01:42||   2005-06-04 01:42|| Front Page Top

#5 RMcLeod, the Left did oppose WWII, right up to the moment the Soviet Union was invaded. The Left in France actively sabotaged the war effort, the Left in Britain had strong misgivings (and said so), and the Left in the U.S. was part of the isolationist movement.

Once the Germans invaded the Soviet Union, the Left spun 180 degrees (on a dime!) and became vociferous in demanding a full war effort.
Posted by Steve White">Steve White  2005-06-04 02:25||   2005-06-04 02:25|| Front Page Top

#6 Thanks for the stats!

There is a bumper sticker that I see frequently around here that says, WAR IS NOT THE ANSWER.

I always want to walk up to them and say, ok...so what IS your answer to prevent the slaughter of millions?

If I had more chutzpa, I'd put a bumper sticker on my car that says:

WAR IS NOT THE ANSWER
let the tyrants slaughter, starve and enslave = what concern of it is mine?
Posted by 2b 2005-06-04 08:04||   2005-06-04 08:04|| Front Page Top

#7 2b: That bumper sticker is too long. Try this:

Liberals love dead Americans.

Says it all.
Posted by badanov 2005-06-04 08:38|| http://www.freefirezone.org]">[http://www.freefirezone.org]  2005-06-04 08:38|| Front Page Top

#8 12,000 give or take 11,999.

One realizes how accurate Iraqi reports are...
Posted by Captain America 2005-06-04 09:39||   2005-06-04 09:39|| Front Page Top

#9 And for a little perspective -

US 2004 Highway Deaths Projected to Reach 42,800 [up slightly from 42,643 in 2003]

It's a quagmire out there. When will the dying end?
Posted by Chinerong Phoper5072 2005-06-04 09:51||   2005-06-04 09:51|| Front Page Top

#10 I have a window sticker that says WAR IS THE ANSWER, YOU DAMNED HIPPY.
Posted by Jackal">Jackal  2005-06-04 11:29|| home.earthlink.net/~sleepyjackal/index.html]">[home.earthlink.net/~sleepyjackal/index.html]  2005-06-04 11:29|| Front Page Top

#11 Badnov, Jackal ...lol!
Posted by 2b 2005-06-04 11:42||   2005-06-04 11:42|| Front Page Top

#12 I have still better bumperstickers:

"LIBERALS LOVE DEAD VIETNAMESE"

"LIBERALS LOVE DEAD CAMBODIANS"

"LIBERALS LOVE DEAD AFGHANS"

"LIBERALS LOVE DEAD IRAKIS"
Posted by JFM">JFM  2005-06-04 11:49||   2005-06-04 11:49|| Front Page Top

#13 Who cares? A thousand or a million or a billion is all the same same to us! They are only 'mud people' just like the Vietmanese / Cambodians / Afghans / Indians / Africans / .....

Small sacrifice for the Greater Glory of the Holy Elite.....
Posted by Liberal Left 2005-06-04 18:43||   2005-06-04 18:43|| Front Page Top

00:05 Unose Whavitle7547
23:50 Whese Flomolet8735
23:44 Dave D.
23:43 Pappy
23:28 Barbara Skolaut
23:25 Barbara Skolaut
23:19 bigjim-ky
23:16 bigjim-ky
23:07 bigjim-ky
23:04 bigjim-ky
23:01 bigjim-ky
22:52 bigjim-ky
22:52 thibaud (aka lex)
22:45 Captain America
22:41 Captain America
22:36 Frank G
22:22 Bodyguard
22:16 Super Hose
22:03 Super Hose
21:59 Alaska Paul
21:56 Super Hose
21:49 Super Hose
21:45 Super Hose
21:37 Frank G









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com